What a silent partner can claim under section 187 UGB when the business owner becomes insolvent, and when an unpaid contribution must be paid into the insolvency estate.
Your shareholder dispute team
Dispute team for shareholders and managing directors
A shareholder dispute calls for corporate law, litigation strategy and commercial understanding from one team. Mag. Bernhard Brandauer is responsible for the legal advice; depending on the conflict, further specialised lawyers of the firm support safeguards, evidence, negotiations and court enforcement.
Contact the teamIf insolvency proceedings are opened over the assets of the owner of a business or other assets, a silent partner has a specific legal position. Under section 187 UGB, the silent partner may assert the claim arising from the contribution as an insolvency claim to the extent that the contribution exceeds the loss share allocated to that partner.
A different obligation can arise when the contribution was still unpaid in full when the proceedings opened. The silent partner must then pay the outstanding amount into the insolvency estate up to the amount required to cover that partner’s loss share. The assessment therefore has two sides: the remaining claim and any contribution still outstanding.
This check classifies the situation under section 187 UGB and identifies the key documents. It does not replace a review of the agreement and accounting records.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
Collect the agreement, contribution account, loss calculation, payment records and order opening the proceedings. These documents show whether an insolvency claim exists or an unpaid contribution must be paid.
First establish whether the agreement creates a silent partnership and whose assets are subject to proceedings. A shareholder loan, the insolvency of a GmbH or the insolvency of a GmbH shareholder follows a different legal framework.
Section 187(1) UGB connects the claim to the contribution and the partner’s own share of the loss. The silent partner may assert the part of the contribution claim that exceeds that loss share. The loss share must therefore be taken into account before the claim amount is determined.
The calculation requires the agreed contribution, the amounts actually paid and the loss allocated to the silent partner under the agreement. Calling an amount capital or profit participation does not answer those questions on its own.
The claim participates in the insolvency proceedings of the owner. The way in which it must be asserted and evidenced depends on the procedural documents and the specific stage of the proceedings. The original contribution amount should therefore not be used without a supporting reconciliation.
Section 187(2) UGB applies when the contribution had not been paid in full when the insolvency proceedings opened. The silent partner must then pay the outstanding amount into the insolvency estate up to the amount required to cover that partner’s loss share.
This obligation is limited to the statutory coverage amount. It is not a general obligation to pay the entire agreed contribution again regardless of the loss. A reconciliation must connect the unpaid contribution, the loss share and payments already made.
The opening date is central to the assessment. Payments before and after that date should be traced separately through bank statements, receipts and accounting records. A later payment should not be assigned to another legal basis without checking the agreement and the actual transaction.
The silent partnership agreement, amendments, contribution terms, contribution account and business results belong in one review. They should show how the loss share was calculated and which amounts have already been paid.
The opening order, communications from the insolvency administrator, annual or interim accounts and payment records should also be secured. The timeline should show the agreement, the agreed contribution, each payment, the loss and the opening of proceedings.
Unclear ledger entries can affect the calculation in either direction. A payment may represent a contribution, repayment, profit withdrawal or loan. The payment reference is evidence, yet it does not replace the review of the agreement and the actual performance.
Section 187 UGB requires proceedings over the assets of the owner of the business or assets. This differs from the insolvency of the GmbH itself. In a GmbH insolvency, the focus is on the company’s assets, its organs and shareholder rights. A separate article on GmbH insolvency addresses that situation.
The insolvency of a GmbH shareholder is another situation. It concerns the share, the insolvency estate and the person entitled to act towards the GmbH. The existing article on an insolvent GmbH shareholder has a different subject.
A shareholder loan must also be distinguished from a silent contribution. Repayment, ranking and recovery of a loan involve another basis for the claim. The separate review of shareholder loans in a GmbH crisis deals with that question.
The claim under section 187 UGB concerns the contribution claim in the owner’s insolvency. A previous repayment of the contribution is a separate set of facts. Whether such a payment can be challenged or reversed depends on the rules applicable to that payment and cannot be answered by section 187 alone.
The termination of a silent partnership also raises a separate question. Notice, death, accounting and repayment can change the legal basis and the relevant date. They should therefore be documented separately from the owner’s insolvency and the calculation under section 187 UGB.
The first step is to identify the current legal position: is there a contribution claim, is a contribution still outstanding, or does the case concern an earlier payment or termination? The answer determines which legal basis must be reviewed next.
The capital provider should assemble the silent partnership agreement and amendments, contribution terms, bank statements and business accounts in chronological order. The opening order must be matched against contributions and the loss calculation.
A clear reconciliation should show the agreed contribution, amounts paid, the loss allocated to the silent partner and the resulting outstanding or excess amount. This makes it possible to distinguish an insolvency claim from a payment into the insolvency estate.
If accounts conflict, records are missing or an action in the insolvency proceedings is approaching, the documents should be reviewed promptly. You can receive new legal information through BRAND current legal news.
Under section 187(1) UGB, the silent partner may assert the part of the contribution claim that exceeds the loss share allocated to that partner. The contribution and loss share must be traceable.
If the contribution was not fully paid when the proceedings opened, section 187(2) UGB requires payment up to the amount needed to cover the silent partner’s own loss share.
That depends on whose assets are affected and whether there is a silent partnership. The insolvency of the GmbH, the insolvency of a GmbH shareholder and a shareholder loan are different situations.
The key documents include the agreement, contribution terms, contribution account, payment records, loss calculation and opening order. They should be arranged chronologically and checked against each other.
Safeguard, challenge and enforce shareholder disputes. Portal for active GmbH conflicts covering first safeguards, resolution challenge, exclusion and preliminary injunction.
Contact